Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal facts

On May 18, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million from the Changwon District Court to a fine of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on October 26, 2009, and a summary order of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on November 19, 2012, respectively.

On February 13, 2018, the Defendant driven D Mapoon in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.112% from a section of approximately 100 meters from the 100-meter radius of blood alcohol level to the front road of the new house located in the same Dong, Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a written reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, etc., Changwon District Court Decision 6237 High Court Decision 2009 High Court Decision 2009 High Court High Court Decision 2469 High Court Decision 2009 High Court Decision 201 High Court Decision 8291 High Court Decision 201 High Court Decision

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which include the following: (a) the Defendant’s mistake was pened in depth and reflected; and (b) there are some circumstances to consider the motive and background leading to the instant crime; (c) the Defendant, other than the previous criminal records, has no other criminal records; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime, including the distance from operation; and (e) the means and consequence of the instant crime, including the circumstances after the crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, intelligence, and environment, determined the same type of punishment as the order.