logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.11.30 2017고단1436
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall lend any access medium with the promise to pay for the use and management of any access medium for electronic financial transactions.

Nevertheless, on February 2017, the defendant would give 2 million won to one head of the Tong and 6 million won to 2.

Around 19:00 on March 3, 2017, the head of Kwikset service who sent a name-based check to the account holder of the Daegu Bank account (C) in the name of the company operated by the defendant and the National Bank Account (D) in the name of the defendant, and notified the name-based bearer of the number and password of the respective physical card.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for the access media for electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on damage reporting, verification of request for remittance, details of entry and withdrawal transactions, page of inquiries about the details of transfers, printed out of the Kakao Stockholm dialogue, data on financial transaction information reply, CCTV data, CCTV data, Kakao Stockholm dialogue, and details of account transactions with national bank accounts;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions for the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order have no record of criminal punishment, and the fact that there is no economic benefit acquired in the instant case shall be determined by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the order.

arrow