A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2016 Highest 4142" is a person who was in a de facto marital relationship with the victim C (V, 45 years of age).

On October 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported that the Defendant moved out of the house the goods of the victim in order for the injured party to take the directors at around 21:50 Who-gu Da Apartment-gu 101, Taedong-gu, Seoul to move out of the house; (b) and (c) deducted the victim from the Mamo-gu Mamo.

“Along with the movement of the victim, the victim took her fry, which is a dangerous object, and took the fry of the fry, from among the animals of the victim who she moved, she was frighting to the floor of the victim, she was frighting to the fright of the victim, she was frighting to the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the victim

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

On October 18, 2016, the defendant of "2017 Highest 562" reported that the victim arranged his/her husband's 101 and 806 of the Daejeon Tae-gu Daejeon Apartment-gu D apartment on October 18, 201, together with his/her husband E (47 years old) to dispose of his/her her son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's Ma

“In doing so, the victim-owned 150,000 won of the market value at the same time was destroyed and damaged by putting one composite string, the market value of which is 150,000 won, on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C, F, and E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel did not display a fry or clothes to the victim, and there was no assault by the victim, such as drinking the victim's head, or pushing the victim's chest with his/her chest, and there was no damage to the plaintiff's flab. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the defendant's flab did not damage the flab.