logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.10 2019고정2595
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of a car in the Dota Campa.

Drivers of motor vehicles and riders of horses passing along roads shall follow signals and instructions conveyed and given by traffic safety facilities, national police officers, etc. controlling traffic.

Nevertheless, on August 8, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle and proceeded in the direction of D apartment shooting distance at the entrance of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the police assistant G, a police assistant, who was engaged in traffic control at the front direction of D apartment, without making a stop signal with the signal signal sent at the front direction, thereby violating the legitimate signal and direction of police officers, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A traffic accident report and an exemplary driver's certificate;

1. CCTV CD [Defendant and defense counsel] asserts that since G was unaware of the fact that it was an exemplary driver who was at the time when G stopped the vehicle in compliance with G’s instructions and was not aware of the fact that it was an exemplary driver at the time when G was engaged in traffic control with the police, G cannot be deemed to violate the Road Traffic Act. According to CCTV video CD, G instructed the Defendant to stop the vehicle in the signal box while shaking the vehicle on the crosswalk by breaking the signal rod at the crosswalk, but it can be recognized that the Defendant stopped the vehicle at the time without G’s instructions, and immediately proceeded with the direction of the vehicle at the right time without the direction of G, the above argument is rejected. Accordingly, the above argument is rejected).

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 156 subparagraph 1 and 5 of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs;

arrow