Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 28, 2016, around 19:59, the Defendant, who was the husband of the Defendant and the victim D, who was the husband of the Defendant, neglected the Defendant’s children, and when the relationship between the Defendant and the victim came to be far away, the Defendant, using his cellular phone, attempted to see the victim’s “affore and ffore the same year as that of the Defendant, and to do so.”

In addition, it is not a end.

N. L. A. L.A. sent L. A. L. a text message stating “I.D., if you reach the Stockholm age, I would am f.m., I.m. am f., I.m., if you look at the victim’s “I.m., I., I. Kao, I.m., I. am, I.m., I. am am, I.m., I., if you look at the victim’s age on April 17, 2017

It is desired to do so, but now ever, so it can be raised up to its content.

어 그러면 그 구청은 적어도 니 낯짝 들고는 못 다닐 거다

The term "the victim's family and workplace" showed the attitude that the victim seems to be detrimental to the honor, etc. of the victim by informing the victim's family and workplace of the unknown relationship.

2. On August 13, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) was made using a mobile phone around 10:44, and then made a Kakakao Stockholm group rooms or rooms with two employees of the victim and his/her workplace, etc. on the basis of the two employees, etc. of the victim and the victim’s workplace.

On August 29, 2016, 16:01, the statement "I ambling the Liquor Tax Act" is written, and around August 29, 201, the victim's name and photograph are written, and the victim's name and photograph are cut up, and the sled fish is working at the family of a woman with a family.

The entrance of the Gu office shall be sent to a childcare center at the entrance of the Gu office and shall not be a male dyna, and in this case, but a

A notice was posted stating “.......”

However, in fact, the defendant had already been divorced from the former husband C on September 27, 201, and the damaged person caused the failure of the family of the defendant.