1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the plaintiff makes a supplementary or supplementary decision as follows with respect to the assertion that the plaintiff contests in this case at this court. Thus, the court of first instance cited the judgment pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence

2. The Plaintiff asserts that there was no prior explanation about the enactment of the instant rules of employment and that there was no fact that the Plaintiff signed a written confirmation of December 11, 2012 (Evidence No. 4) stating that he/she would not raise any objection to the rules of employment.

However, the written evidence Nos. 3, 4, and 6 and the facts acknowledged by the written appraisal by the appraiser J of this court, i.e., the C Center, prior to the enactment of the Rules of Employment on December 20, 2012 by five (the plaintiff, D, E, F, and G) of indefinite contract workers and five (the plaintiff, D, E, F) fixed-term workers at the time of the enactment of the Rules of Employment as of December 11, 2012, the National Labor Relations Commission appears to have recognized the fact that workers except the plaintiff at the time of the reexamination process of the National Labor Relations Commission were to have signed the letter of the enactment of the Rules of Employment. Furthermore, this court appraiser submitted a written confirmation to the effect that the plaintiff and the principal have affixed a direct signature after hearing an explanation about the Rules of Employment, and in view of the aforementioned circumstances, it can be acknowledged that the Plaintiff signed the above letter of confirmation or the above fact that the Plaintiff had signed the letter of "A".

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion cannot be accepted.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.