A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 12, 2013, between around 15:00 to 16:00, the Defendant entering the building, at one of the agricultural cooperatives managed by the victim C, located at the south of the Gangnam-gun, Seoggl, 122-2, the Defendant: (a) directed the victim C to steal the goods; (b) directed back the garrising building attached to the said garrising building; (c) opened an unreshed glass window and intruded into the said garrising building.

2. As above, the Defendant: (a) thief, as one of the victims agricultural cooperatives owned by the thief and displayed at the display stand for sale, stolen foods worth KRW 290,600 in total; and (b) cut off the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Seizure records;

1. Field photographs, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (related to the cutting of CCTV images at the scene of a suspect's crime, cases concerning seized articles, list of damaged articles, and submission of damaged amount);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of sentence on the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] the scope of sentence for the larceny [special scief] to be mitigated: intrusion theft [special scief] to general property: the area of mitigation [decision of the recommended area] of livelihood [limited to the scope of mitigation of punishment] mitigated area of crime [limited to imprisonment for August to one year] / The area of mitigation [whether suspended sentence is suspended] - The major reasons for writing: (unlawful) the same criminal record (not more than five years, not more than a suspended sentence), no damage is recovered - The general reasons for writing: (Unlawful

2. The Defendant, who was sentenced to a sentence on September 26, 2012, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for special larceny, etc. at the Chuncheon District Court on September 26, 2012, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence on October 5, 2012, and is still under the current suspended sentence, but is not well aware of the fact that the said judgment became final and conclusive, and the Defendant

However, theft damage.