logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.09.03 2014고단1041
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving of D Poter cargo vehicles.

On February 5, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 06:40, and proceeded at the speed of 60km from the distance of the Ordinance to the parallel of the Women's Culture Center, which is in the right parallel of the net city, in accordance with the two-lanes from the distance of the Ordinance, at the speed of 60km.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to observe the signal and drive the intersection in good manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant violated the signal and did not state the right side properly, and did not turn to the left on the opposite side by occupational negligence while driving the said cargo as it is on the opposite side, and received the front part of the FK7 car of the victim E(33 years old) driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered sculatory salts, etc. requiring treatment for about three weeks, and at the same time escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the victim, even though the victim's driving car is damaged by the sum of repair costs, such as the exchange of the front driver, etc., and thus, saving the victim.

2. On February 5, 2014, at around 06:40, Defendant B received telephone communications from A that the accident occurred as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), and discovered A that he was seated at a place 25 meters away from the accident site in front of the women's culture center in the Ycheon-si, Ycheon-si, at the accident site in front of the women's culture center in the Ycheon-si, and offered a proposal to her driver for the purpose of insurance treatment because he/she was the owner of the vehicle and the comprehensive insured.

Accordingly, the defendant has taken a part of a bridge, and made a false statement to H as a driver to the staff belonging to the Net Police Station G District, which was called to the scene of the accident. At that time, the defendant is located within G District.

arrow