1. On October 24, 2012, the Defendant issued a decision to grant subsidies of KRW 45,00,000 to Plaintiff A and issued a disposition to revoke the decision and return the subsidies.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. In order to support the installation of energy-saving heating systems to facilities farmers, the Defendant implemented the “Support Project for Timber pelpellets,” in 2010, and 201, with the content that subsidized 60% of the project cost (30% of the State expenses, 9% of the Do expenses, and 21% of the Si expenses) out of the project cost (hereinafter “instant Project”).

B. Plaintiff A’s husband, B, and the other Plaintiffs were selected as the business entity subject to the instant project as those engaged in growing facilities at Kimcheon-si. The Defendant granted subsidies following the implementation of the instant project to B and the other Plaintiffs each of the subsidies indicated in the “amount of disposition to be returned” column in the attached disposition sheet (hereinafter “instant subsidies”) and paid them.

C. On October 24, 2012, the Defendant revoked the decision to grant subsidies pursuant to Article 17 of the Kimcheon-si Subsidy Management Ordinance and issued orders to return the instant subsidies on the ground that the Defendant received subsidies in violation of Articles 30 and 31 of the former Act on the Budgeting Subsidy Management (amended by the Subsidy Management Act, July 25, 201; hereinafter “former Subsidy Management Act”).

(D) The Plaintiffs filed an administrative appeal, but the Gyeongbuk-do Administrative Appeals Commission rendered a ruling to dismiss all the Plaintiffs’ claims on March 25, 2013. [In the event that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap's 1, 6, Eul's 3 through 8, Eul's 10, and 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings, each of the entries in Gap's 1, 6, Eul's 3 through

2. Article 30(1) of the former Subsidy Management Act provides that when a subsidized business operator receives a subsidy by false application or other unlawful means, all or part of the decision to grant a subsidy may be revoked. Article 31(1) of the same Act provides that where the decision to grant a subsidy is revoked, a subsidy shall already be granted to a subsidy business in the part where the decision to grant a subsidy is revoked.