Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 17, 2017, the Defendant, at around 20:50, 200 Won-gu, Suwon-si B, Sinwon-si, “Ackhne cost is borne by a person who has taken alcohol.”

“A police officer D(34 tax) belonging to the Suwon Department C District District of the Suwon Department, who received a report of 112, did not enter this end.

I think of this, I tried to see this, and tried to see this, “this fluor,” and to use two tights, the chest of the above D in two tights.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in charge of handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation of each E and F’s statements (to report shote E and F’s hearing of statements);

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime committed by a police officer after receiving a report on the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not mean that the nature of the crime committed by a assault or assault is not somewhat weak, and even if there were criminal records who were sentenced to suspended execution on several occasions due to interference with official duties in 194, etc., it is highly likely to criticize the defendant who committed the crime in this case again. However, it is a contingent crime, and the degree of interference with assault or execution of duties is relatively less severe, taking into account the fact that it is a contingent crime, the degree of interference with assault or execution of duties is not relatively excessive, and the fact that the mistake is recognized and it is against depth, and other factors constituting the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act