beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for nine years, for three years, and for three years and six months, for Defendant C.
, however, the defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In each charges, unnecessary parts of the charges were deleted.
Ⅰ. The Defendants’ status and role are the representative director of Q Q Co., Ltd. who is engaged in the livestock product distribution business at the above address of the director (representative) of P Co., Ltd. who is engaged in the livestock product distribution business at the Busan Jin-gu O and the fourth floor, and the representative director of P Co., Ltd. who actually runs the loan brokerage business at the Busan Jin-guO and the fourth floor (the inside director S and the wife of Defendant A).
Defendant
B is a director (representative) of U.S. corporation that runs the wholesale and retail business of agricultural and livestock products in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City T.
Defendant
C is the intra-company director (representative) of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government who is engaged in the wholesale and retail business of agricultural and livestock products in accordance with V and 205.
X is the representative director of Y (Z: warehouse name) who is engaged in the freezing warehouse business, etc. in the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City T.
The Defendants, together with the above companies, actually operated AA (Representative AB), AC (Representative AD), AE (Representative AF), AE (Representative AF), AG (Representative AH (Representative AH), AG (Representative AH), and P, Q, U, and W (hereinafter “P-affiliated borrower company”).
Ⅱ. Criminal facts 2017 Gohap 69- Defendants
1. Defendant A’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud);
A. As the Defendant and the Defendant, B, C, etc. were running a P-affiliated borrower company from around 2012, the Defendant was unable to repay the existing land-backed loans. From around September 2014 to March 2015, the Defendant and the Defendant established a company that runs the respective livestock products distribution business, etc. in the name of C, B and B along with C, AF, AH, AB, and AD, and subsequently, constituted a company that is engaged in the respective livestock products distribution business, etc. in the name of AF, AH, AB, and AD. However, even if there was no actual land-related purchase sale transaction, the Defendant would be pretended to have been a transaction through so