logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.07.19 2015고단2876
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

There is no one between the defendant and C.

The defendant and the victim are customers of "F points" located in the Ma-gu, Ma-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

On July 18, 2015, the Defendant promised to carry on the business along with the foregoing D, which is the owner of the business, while drinking alcoholic beverages at the above Hop on July 22 and 10.

Around that time, the Defendant observed that the victimized person was able to enter the said headhouse as a guest and ordered the drinking, and the victim said that “I are my house in this case, and I are my house, and I are my house in this case.”

However, the defendant, who was found to have neglected the statement of the defendant, caused the damage to the victim by gathering the alcohol remaining at the beer of the beer and the beer of the beer who was on the beer table of the above beer table, and the glass so that the victim can be on the right side of the victim's right side, thereby causing about two weeks of treatment, such as slots, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury to C;

1. On-site photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel held that the defendant did not come up under the table table booms where the victim was seated with beer and laid towards the kitchen, and thereafter, D, the owner of the business of this case, as the victim and the Sivirbrator, collected the bottled on the floor of the table and used the remaining stones concurrently, and the victim suffered the injury by the victim by sprinking it to the victim, and the victim was denied the injury.

However, in the investigation agency and this court, G, who is a witness, stated that there is no possibility that the victim was injured by the act of using the same as above in the judgment of the defendant, and that G's statement is specific and consistent, and that there is no special relationship with the defendant and the victim.

arrow