logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.06.28 2018고단966
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving DOba.

On October 6, 2017, the Defendant, at the time of 06:30 on 06:0 on 06:30 on f.o., Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, had been proceeding by turning the current distance from each shooting distance room to the view of the transmission distance.

Since there is an intersection where signal apparatus is installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by thoroughly running the driver of the motor vehicle in the front direction and driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the red signal crossing in violation of the signal at the time, and did not discover the Fenz S350 car of the victim E (56) driving that was going to the intersection from the front side of the city at the end of the city at the time in accordance with the normal signals at the time, and did not discover the passenger car at the end of the city at the end of the city at the end of the city at the time, and shocked the left side of the said vehicle at the top of the above Oba.

After all, the defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence the injury of the victim E, such as the left-hand lush salt in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, the injury of the victim G (57 ) who was accompanied by the above car, such as the lubal salt and tension on the left-hand left-hand side of the treatment days, and the injury of the victim H (19 e.g., the victim H (19 e., the e., the back-side seat) who was on the back of the luto, suffered from the injury of approximately six weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in E and G;

1. A traffic accident report (on-site investigation report);

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen of field photographs, damaged vehicles (benz photographs), motion pictures of damaged vehicles, and motion pictures of damaged vehicles;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Order of community service;

arrow