logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.17 2017나33499
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception of the following parts. Therefore, this part of the judgment is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. The height part of the judgment of the first instance court No. 3, 2, 3, and 2 of the judgment of the first instance court, “the plaintiff is the parent of the deceased,” and “the plaintiff is the father of the deceased,” and each “the plaintiff” of the 3th 7th 7th 7th 4th 16th 16th 16th 19

On the other hand, the part of the first instance court's decision No. 3, No. 13, "On the other hand, the plaintiff neglected to drive a vehicle while drinking, and eventually caused the accident in this case. Thus, the defendant asserts that the insurer of the defendant vehicle is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle." After the first instance court's decision No. 3, No. 12, "if, however, the plaintiff seeks payment of KRW 100,000,00 after offsetting negligence in consideration of the negligence of the deceased," the plaintiff's decision No. 4, No. 8 of the first instance court's decision No. 4, No. 4, No. 15 of the first instance court's decision No. 4, "The plaintiff did not seem to have invaded the lane of the vehicle in this case."

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed.

arrow