logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.10 2016나6847
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “The June 21, 2014” in Part 7 of Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as “the June 21, 2016,” and each description and image of Evidence Nos. 17 or 21 (including the number of pages) are the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of the entries and images of Evidence No. 17 or No. 21 (including the number of pages), which are insufficient to recognize the defendant’s assertion as evidence additionally submitted in the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow