1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 92,105,449 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 1,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 50,000 to Plaintiff C; and (d) each of them.

1. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. The occurrence of liability (1) caused injury to the Plaintiff, such as bovine spongiformiformiform, C, and C’s wife on April 16, 2015 (hereinafter “instant accident”), 2. The Defendant is not liable for dispute between the parties to a mutual aid agreement with respect to the said bus, or due to the negligence in violation of the duty to stop the bus while driving along four-lanes prior to the exit of the two-lanes in Seoul Seocho-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, along with four-lanes of the forest basin of the two-lane, and due to the negligence in violation of signal. At the time, the Defendant is liable for damages to the Plaintiffs, including the number of buses A and B (hereinafter the same shall apply).

B. The defendant asserts that the defendant's liability should be limited in consideration of the fact that the signal of the crosswalk A is not taken into account the situation of the vehicle in the vicinity of the horser where the signal of the plaintiff A is changed to the pedestrian signal, and the accident of this case was caused by negligence. Thus, the defendant's above argument is without merit, since there are written statements and written statements of traffic accident occurrence situation and written protocol of examination of suspect (Evidence No. 4 and 5) as evidence consistent with the defendant's above argument, but considering that the point where the accident of this case occurred is about the F building distance, it is difficult to obtain the above D's statement as it is, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and there is no other reason to limit the defendant's liability. Thus, the defendant's above argument is without merit.

2. The following facts shall be admitted to the scope of compensation for damage: