logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.01.12 2017고단3039
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(b) the defendant;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened a corporate account under the name of the legal entity from a person who was unaware of the name and became aware of in contact with an advertisement on the Internet job site; (b) opened an account under the name of the legal entity; and (c) opened a corporate account with a title of 10,000 won per one head of the Tong on the receipt of a title, and opened a corporate account under the name of the legal entity; and (d) issued a passbook, cash card, and an OTP card to the above name and received KRW 100,000 per head of the Tong.

On March 22, 2017, the Defendant issued B’s business registration certificate, certificate of corporate seal impression, certified copy of the corporate registry, power of attorney, and the head of the corporation, etc. from the above person under the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in order to induce the above company’s normal business even though the Defendant had not worked as the head of the above company’s management department, and the Defendant was issued the passbook, cash card, OTP card, etc. with the above bank account opened in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name of the above company B, in order to induce the victim bank as if the Defendant worked as the head of the above company’s management department, and had not worked as the head of the above company’s normal business, and was issued with the passbook, cash card, OTP card, etc. connected to the above account.

In addition, the Defendant, as described in the attached list of crimes, was issued a passbook, cash card,OTPP card, etc. connected to each account by deceiving the victim bank through the same method three times in total on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with a name-free person, interfered with the opening of the account of the victim bank by fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow