logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.01.16 2013구합63155
입찰참가자격제한처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

...,143.75 13 춘추운동복 (해군/해병) 해군상의 13,881.04 13,603 97.99698 13,600 11,778.04 -1,821.96 14 춘추운동복 (육군) 해병상의 14,547.90 14,256 97.99352 14,250 12,488.49 -1,761.51 해군하의 16,333.61 16,006 97.99426 16,000 15,220.77 -779.23 육군 32,649.90 31,670 96.99877 31,670 29,362.55 -2,307.45 15 운동복, 학군단용 동기용 33,920.20 33,920 99.99941 33,800 32,911.69 -888.31 하기용 19,575.78 19,570 99.97047 19,500 17,500.28 -1,999.72 16 춘추운동복 (해군/해병) 해군상의 14,515.00 14,224 97.99518 14,220 13,031.11 -1,188.89 해병상의 15,342.00 15,035 97.99896 15,030 13,864.32 -1,165.68 해군하의 15,754.00 15,438 97.99416 15,430 15,131.71 -298.29 해병하의 18,058.00 17,696 97.99535 17,690 17,289.14 -400.86 17 춘추운동복 (육군) 34,998.00 34,298 97.99989 33,950 32,654.62 -1,295.38 18 운동복 (학군단용) 동기용 36,808.04 36,071 97.99761 35,900 34,487.53 -1,412.47 하기용 20,933.78 20,515 97.9995 20,500 18,864.12 -1,635.88 (단위 원) * 정당원가에는 이 사건 세금계산서로 증가된 재료비뿐만 아니라, 피고의 원가계산 착오(간접노무비율과 간접경비율 산식 중 직접노무비에 외주가공비를 포함하지 않은 착오 등)를 수정(간접노무비율과 간접경비율 변경 등)한 것을 포함하여 산출된 금액이다.

(5) On October 25, 2013, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on the basis of the party cost and contract price calculated as above, that “the Plaintiff is obligated to pay KRW 2,459,973,677 of unjust enrichment, as stated in the separate sheet under Article 26 of the Special Conditions of the instant contract, and additional KRW 1,212,474,787 equivalent to unjust enrichment, as well as additional dues equivalent to the amount of unjust enrichment, as stated in the separate sheet under Article 26 of the aforesaid Special Conditions.”

On February 11, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming the payment of goods against the Republic of Korea (2014 Gohap507360).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, A, 2.

arrow