All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is that the respective punishment of the court below (one year of imprisonment for the defendant A, and ten months of imprisonment for the defendant B) is too unreasonable;

2. The facts that the defendants led to the confession of each of the crimes in this case, and the defendant B did not want the punishment of the defendant under an agreement with the victim are favorable circumstances.

However, the Defendants committed a crime such as taking money from an elderly victim even though they had been punished several times for the same crime, and Defendant A did not receive the victim's statements, Defendant B did not commit each of the crimes of this case during the repeated crime period due to this type of crime, taking into account the unfavorable circumstances such as the Defendants' age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of crime, and consequence, and all of the sentencing conditions of this case, such as the crime's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and means of crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the lower court's punishment is too unreasonable to exceed the reasonable scope of discretion. Thus, the Defendants' assertion

3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.