A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Height 925] Social work personnel shall not leave their service or serve in the field concerned for a total period of at least eight days without justifiable grounds.

On March 16, 2009, the Defendant filed an application for the suspension of service on the grounds of new illness treatment with the Daejeon District Court located in Seocheon-dong, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and did not return to the Daejeon District Court's branch after December 19, 201, even though the suspension of service was permitted from September 19, 201 to December 18, 201.

Accordingly, the defendant left a work area for not less than eight days without justifiable reasons.

[2013 Highest 972] The Defendant is the former husband of the victim C, who is the father of the victim C, the deceased E is the husband of the victim C, the victim F is the father of the network E, the victim G is the deceased E, the victim H is the head of the victim H, who is the omission of the above D, and the victim J is the victim H and the dual-child relationship.

On April 2010, the Defendant, at the home of the victim C, K Apartment 102 Dong 1201 and 1201, declared that “The Defendant was aware of the auction division while working in the Seosan court. The Defendant received land information from auction through the auction division and can receive a successful bid for a lower amount. However, after receiving a successful bid, the Defendant made a false statement to “investment in money,” because it can give a lot of profits if he resells or owns the land after receiving a successful bid.”

However, in fact, although the defendant served as public interest service personnel in the Seosan branch of the Daejeon District Court, he was friendly with or did not receive information from employees in charge of auction in the above Seosan branch of the Daejeon District Court, and was willing to receive land through L's real estate business operator. Even if he received money from the victim for auction price, he was willing to use it for some personal purposes, so even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to obtain profit by winning or resell the land.