1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the payment order shall be revoked.

1. The occurrence of claim for damages caused by a tort;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendants conspired to enter into a lease agreement and concluded a false lease agreement for the purpose of reducing the loans by deceiving the Plaintiff, and received a lease agreement from the Plaintiff by deceiving the Plaintiff by means of false move-in report. Therefore, the Defendants jointly asserted that the Plaintiff is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by tort.

As to this, Defendant A did not gain any profit by receiving a loan from the Plaintiff and transferring it to Defendant B, and there was no collusion with E, the principal offender of the fraud, etc., and Defendant A did not claim that the Plaintiff did not bear any liability for damages caused by the tort.

In addition, Defendant B was entrusted with only one apartment bond in his name to E, and E prepared a false lease contract on the apartment house, and he did not claim that he did not prepare a false lease contract with Defendant A on that apartment.

B. In collusion with G, etc., Defendant B or E prepared a false lease agreement, etc. with Defendant B, on the ground that G et al. did not lease the instant apartment, and submitted it to a financial institution to obtain a loan from the financial institution for a rent-on loan and acquired it by using it for the same method and purpose, around July 201, Defendant A as a lessee, in collusion with G, etc., and as to Defendant B’s title trust (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

Although Defendant A did not intend to rent the apartment of this case, Defendant A wishes to prepare a false lease contract with the party who requested to prepare the above false lease contract from the party-friendly G by requesting him to do so.