The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. Although the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case, the crime of aiding and abetting an offender of this case is likely to seriously impede the defendant's exercise of strict criminal justice power by having G attend the prosecutor's office in the form of self-denunciation and make false statements, thereby hindering the discovery of substantial truth. The crime of perjury of this case is limited to the defendant's direct appearance in the court and makes false statements contrary to memory, thereby hindering the court's deliberation for finding the truth and causing confusion and incompetence in the state's judicial action. The nature of each of the crimes of this case is very poor. Each of the crimes of this case is committed with the purpose of concealing the facts that the defendant operated the illegal game room together with B. The defendant has escaped for a considerable period after each of the crimes of this case. Considering the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means, results, etc. of the crime, the defendant's punishment against the defendant is too unfair.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.