logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017.12.22 2017재두34
징계처분 취소 청구
Text

The request for retrial is dismissed.

The costs of re-adjudications are included in the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

The grounds for request for retrial shall be examined.

The gist of the grounds for the request for retrial of this case lies in the grounds for retrial under Article 451(1)9 of the Civil Procedure Act (hereinafter “when the judgment was omitted on important matters affecting the judgment”), since the judgment subject to retrial was dismissed under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal without making a judgment on the illegality of the judgment of the court below.

However, the ground for dismissing a case falling under Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal does not constitute a legitimate ground for retrial, and as long as an argument on the grounds for appeal by an original judgment constitutes a ground for rejection of a trial under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and dismiss a final appeal without further deliberation, it cannot be deemed that the original judgment omitted the judgment on the grounds for

(See Supreme Court Decisions 96Da325 delivered on November 22, 1996, and 2008Da502 delivered on February 12, 2009, etc.). Therefore, the retrial is dismissed, and the costs of the retrial are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow