logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.11.29 2017고정738
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who drives a CDI car.

On June 4, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car around 05:20, and driven the road of 52-lanes in the north-gu, Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-ro, the 52-lanes in front of the sexually fixed post office at a speed that is impossible to identify the two-lanes in the surface of the Osung elementary school from sexually fixed middle school.

Since there is an intersection where a red on-and-off signal is installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to temporarily stop the motor vehicle before entering the intersection and drive the motor vehicle safely by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded without temporarily suspending at the above intersection with a red on-and-off signal, and by negligence, proceed from the right side of the proceeding to the left side in accordance with a yellow on-and-off signal.

C Driving received the left-hand part of CLA200 from Defendant’s driving prior to the CDI.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as finite salt, etc. for about two weeks, respectively, to the victim E (the remaining, 24 years old) and F (the remaining, 24 years old) G (the remaining, and 24 years old), who was on board the said D taxi due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of occurrence of a traffic accident C;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a survey report on actual conditions and report on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, acknowledges his mistake as the primary offender.

It seems that medical expenses were paid to the victims through insurance.

However, in this case, the defendant suffered an injury to a large number of victims by violating the signal.

arrow