A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On October 1, 2013, the Defendant’s “C” operated by the Defendant in Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, is insufficient for the Victim D to expand and operate the hub sales store.

The loan of KRW 20,000,000 to 1.5 million shall be paid with interest during the three month, and the principal shall be paid with interest until December 2014.

However, in fact, the Defendant had previously planned to use the accumulated debt amount to be changed to the amount equivalent to KRW 100 million when operating the E agency in the Gancheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do. The Defendant had no intention or ability to repay the borrowed debt amount as promised to the victim because it did not have any property specially owned in the situation where the Defendant did not dismiss each month.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, received KRW 15 million on the same day from the victim’s Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number:F) in the name of the Defendant, and acquired KRW 20 million in total from the victim to the 5 million on the same day.

B. On August 30, 2014, the Defendant received a request from the above victim C to purchase the E product amounting to KRW 3 million.

However, the facts are that the defendant was in a financial crisis, such as the above paragraph (a) at the time, and that C was immediately before the closure of the business, so even if he was delivered KRW 3 million from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to purchase all of the products.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 3 million from the injured party on the same day, and then purchased only a product equivalent to KRW 1 million on the same day, and acquired 2 million won, which is the difference.

(c)

On September 1, 2014, the Defendant stated that “Around September 1, 2014, the Defendant would have repaid KRW 3 million to the said victim with the loan of KRW 3 million.”

However, the facts were that the defendant was a virtue in the financial crisis as described in the above paragraph (a) and the above C also closed down.