logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.07.05 2018구합2247
체육관입관 결정처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Case history

A. C clubs (hereinafter “instant club”) are organizations comprised of persons who conduct activities in the E-high-school, after-high-school, in Seoul D from around 1990, together with the outdoor distribution internship in the E-high school located in Seoul.

B. On June 2014, the Defendant established indoor worships within the F Zone, the instant club from the instant club, subject to the said establishment.

The letter of consent was received to restore the Badton as a green area as stated in the port.

C. Part of the members of the instant club is the main axis. B.

On January 9, 2017, upon the establishment of an indoor theater, the Plaintiff was established on January 9, 2017 for the purpose of being entrusted with the establishment by the Defendant, and 48 of the members of the instant club were paid to the Plaintiff and became its members.

After that, in Seoul, the indoor Tradton was established in G, and on July 11, 2017, the name was temporarily opened as Hgymna, and the name was changed to Igna.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant sports center”). E

On June 23, 2017, the Defendant entered into an entrustment management agreement with the president of the Gu Facilities Management Corporation and the instant gymnasiums.

F. When the Plaintiff was unable to be entrusted with the operation of the instant sports center, some of its members withdrawn from the Plaintiff on July 2017.

G. In order to amend the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Ordinance on the Establishment, Management, and Operation of Sports Facilities (hereinafter “instant Ordinance”), the Gu Office demanded the Plaintiff and its members to organize and submit a membership roll to determine the benefits to be granted to the sports clubs with the same name as the instant club (hereinafter “instant club”) around August 30, 2017, in order to ensure that the said sports center was closed for the establishment of the instant sports center and to determine the benefits to be granted to the sports clubs and their members.

Accordingly, the plaintiff and the present club of this case submitted their respective membership lists.

arrow