logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.05.30 2018고단3295
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From November 14, 2017, a person operating a game room in the trade name called "F Gameland" by installing a game machine such as 30 games and 30 games from the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and 5th level, and Defendant B is the above game site exchanger.

No one shall arrange for money exchange or money exchange or repurchase results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes, and game products related business entities shall allow others to engage in gambling or other speculative acts or leave them to do so by using game products.

Nevertheless, from November 14, 2017 to February 22, 2018, the Defendants conspired to offer money in the game room to customers from the above game room and lost or obtained points according to the result of the game, the Defendants continued to exchange the above free-of-charge by allowing customers to use the game machine amounting to KRW 10,000 per 10,00,000 for each card without any specific confirmation, by allowing them to use the same free-of-charge, and continuously selling the said free-of-charge to other customers at the non-place and by continuously exchanging the above market price by purchasing KRW 9,00,00,000 after deducting the fee of KRW 10,00 per 10,000 for free-of-charge voucher.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to search for the above game site by allowing the customers who had engaged in gambling and other speculative acts using game products, or leaving them do so, and exchange the results of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The contents of the witness G’s statement in the court room are consistent and concrete, and there is no inconsistency with other evidence, and there is a false representation in the above statement.

arrow