1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From September 13, 2010, the Plaintiff operates the “C Counseling Center” in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon. The Defendant selected the Plaintiff as eligible for the subsidies of the “C Counseling Center Operation Support Project for Domestic Violence and Sexual Violence, 2013” and paid subsidies, such as the cost of counseling center operation, to the Plaintiff from September 13, 2013 to March 2014.

B. On April 10, 2014, the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission received a report on the Plaintiff’s unjust acceptance of subsidies and illegal use of subsidies, and payment of benefits to counseling center employees. On June 30, 2014, the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission (the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission) sent the case to the police and Incheon Metropolitan City to cancel the designation of counseling center and recover subsidies with respect to the fact that the Plaintiff unlawfully acquired personnel expenses for D, E and F.

C. On August 18, 2014, the Defendant decided on August 18, 2014 that the Plaintiff’s act constitutes “an act of receiving subsidies by unlawful or unjust means other than the purpose of subsidies, and notified the Plaintiff of the suspension of subsidies.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 and 2 Eul evidence 1 to 6 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff alleged that it was practically difficult for the plaintiff to employ the employees of counseling centers who are qualified as the workers of counseling centers, and the volunteers received subsidies in the process of employing them after being qualified as the workers of counseling centers. At present, they employ qualified counseling centers and operate counseling centers, most of the subsidies received were used for the operation of counseling centers, such as paying them to the intern employees, and the full amount of subsidies recovered was returned to the defendant, and the plaintiff contributed to the long-term community, the disposition of this case is unlawful by abusing discretion or abusing authority.

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

C. As seen earlier, determination 1.