logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.08.10 2016고단1667
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of CAD car.

On January 26, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 17:30 on January 26, 2016, and continued to drive the road in front of the 1118 Pool post office as Dong-dong, Pyeongtaek-si.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, there was a duty of care to pay attention to those who are engaged in driving of the motor vehicles so that they do not violate the center line.

Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the Defendant neglected to commit a crime, and neglected the center line to go beyond the opposite opposite line, and neglected to go on the opposite line, and thereby, committed the crime partially modified to the extent that it does not interfere with the exercise of the right of defense. The facts charged are recognized as follows: “The left side part of the driver’s vehicle is adjacent to the right side of the driver’s vehicle;” but the facts charged are partially revised to the extent that it does not interfere with the exercise of the right of defense.

was received.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the 7, 8 cage cage cage cages, etc., to the right side, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The legal statement of witness D, F, G and H;

1. A traffic accident report, report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, on the scene photograph of an accident, and medical certificate;

1. Judgment on the issues of the traffic accident analysis report and traffic accident analysis appraisal report

1. Unlike the facts charged that the part on the right side of the Defendant’s alleged vehicle and the part on the left side of the victim’s vehicle first conflict, the victim’s vehicle going behind to the right side of the vehicle after coming to the right side and going to the right side to the right side of the opposite vehicle and going to the right side to a certain extent, and the vehicle going behind after going to the right side of the vehicle. The front side of the victim’s vehicle reconfise into the right side of the vehicle in the direction of visibility by the Defendant vehicle.

arrow