logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.12.11 2015고단907
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 18, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.) at the Seoul Central District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 22, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. At around 10:30 on June 11, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim, including, but not limited to, the security of the detention house and the victim F of teachers in charge of the 7th floor in charge of the security of the above detention house in the situation where several prisoners are in the vicinity of the 143 Seoul detention house 7 Seoul detention house, Ga, E, etc., in the middle of the 143 Seoul detention house.

2. The Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties against F by a correctional officer is at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, and immediately after the day as in the preceding paragraph, to F of the above teacher F, who returned to the worker room for another business, with his personal phone, and, in turn, he interfered with the lawful execution of duties of F by a correctional officer in relation to the confinement, management, treatment, etc. in the detention house, by threatening F, “I am soon and soon as he knows as he knows as in the case of Sick, I am good, I am.”

3. At around 14:20 on June 11, 2015, the Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties against correctional officer G requested the Defendant to verify the content of the said detention house I teacher G’s three points of the document envelope in the process of undergoing a living room inspection in the middle floor H of the 6 expropriation Dong of the said Seoul detention house. The Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties against the correctional officer G was one of the process of checking the content of the document envelope by Gap’s own interest and threatening G to 13 days, namely, “the domestic document should be given to the public, I will make a complaint against the public, and I will make a accusation against the public, and I will make it known that G will have three points of the document envelope.

arrow