A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 25, 2015, at around 22:50, the Defendant was subject to control on the ground that he driven under the influence of alcohol on the csanb located in Pyeongtaek-si B by the chief of the police box affiliated with the csanb, and the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the traffic control of police officers by putting the fluence to the internal key, to the house, to the house, to the house, to the fluence, to the fluence, to the fluence, to the fluence, to the fluence, to the fluence, to the fluence, and to the fluence, to the fluence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of written reports filed by drivers;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The scope of recommending sentencing guidelines on poor quality of crime: Imprisonment for six months to one year and four months;