1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from February 11, 2017 to May 25, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a legal wife of C who completed the marriage report on November 20, 1998, and has two women between C and C.

B. The Defendant was in close vicinity with C’s workplace, and received the following Kakao Stockholm messages.

Of course, from one to one to another, there is a difficulty in getting out of one to another.

The identification of only one water shall be made.

Macl as we planned to do so: (The character in good form) Defendant: The same must be sufficiently known to the Maclova, but may not know even if he or she is the same.

It is more difficult to say that the idea of why it is inevitable to change the reality now, because it would be able to listen to a clear statement due to marbly marcing, so it is more important for the new test now.

Above 100 Ma30 up to

We can see the answer at the end of the last three months due to the power of the party.

In addition, I do not think this article now, and I cannot see that it only follows the proposal.

In other words, whether such words are false or not, should not be called her husband. If you have been flicked, the key to the end of the party is crupt.

Although we have been fluently fluently fluently, we need to understand. I do not change in mind.

피고 : 수고하시고 이따봐요~~ 사랑해~~♡♡♡ 남편 : (서로 껴안는 모습의 캐릭터 이모티콘을 다수 보냄) 사랑한다

b. To kill in a way that she can satisfy and happyly.

(i) [Grounds for recognition] unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1, 2, and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. Determination

A. 1) In principle, a third party’s act of infringing on or interfering with a married couple’s communal life falling under the essence of marriage and infringing on a spouse’s right as a spouse, thereby causing emotional distress to the spouse, by committing a tort (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Meu197, Nov. 20, 201).