logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.18 2017가단5095545
공제금 등 청구의 소
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 16,80,00, and KRW 10,800,000 to the Plaintiff B, and each of the said money from July 19, 2017 to July 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A’s lease agreement is concluded. Plaintiff A’s brokerage on December 6, 2013, as the broker of D, a licensed real estate agent on December 6, 2013, indicated in attached Form 2, E (hereinafter “instant multi-family house”).

(F) The term of lease deposit KRW 90,000,000, and the term of lease from December 31, 2013 to December 30, 2015 was set and leased as the term of lease (hereinafter referred to as “the term of lease 1”).

(2) After examining the first lease of this case with the Plaintiff, D, while mediating the first lease of this case, explained to the Plaintiff as to each right to collateral security (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security)), 108,818,180 won (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security)), 108,180 won (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security)) of the amount of maximum debt indicated in the register of the multi-family house of this case and its site, and the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security (the right to collateral security) of this case) of this case). However, D did not specifically explain the lease existing in the house of this case at the time.

B. On November 19, 2014, Plaintiff B, as the broker of I and J, leased the instant real estate K from E with the lease deposit of KRW 70,00,000, and the lease term from December 6, 2014 to December 6, 2016 (hereinafter “instant lease”) (hereinafter “instant lease”)

(2) After examining Plaintiff B, while mediating for the instant lease on December 8, 2014, the J paid the said lease deposit to E, and received a fixed date after the moving-in report was completed on December 8, 2014, the J explained to Plaintiff B as to each of the collective security rights of KRW 1,170,000,000, and KRW 270,000,000, which are indicated in the register of the instant multi-family house, but did not specifically explain the lease existing in the instant real estate.

(c)in this case;

arrow