The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as a patient with alcohol dependence, was under the influence of alcohol at the time of each of the instant crimes, and was in a state of having no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the background, process, means and method of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant’s act before and after the commission of the crime, etc. as revealed in the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime, thereby having lost or weak ability to discern things or make decisions. Therefore, this part of the Defendant’s assertion is rejected

B. Although the defendant acknowledges his own crime against the assertion of unfair sentencing and the amount of damage is a small amount of money, the defendant has been punished for the crime of fraud 21 times including a sentence and a single sentence, the defendant has been repeatedly punished several times as above, and the defendant has committed each of the crimes of this case without agreement with the victims until now, and has not made any specific effort to recover from damage, and in full consideration of the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, and other circumstances leading to the crime, etc., the defendant's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, this part of the defendant's assertion is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.