1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part shall be dismissed.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 17, 1994, the Plaintiff and the Defendant acquired 69/180 shares in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 180 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and 111/180 shares, respectively.

B. Around April 8, 1997, the Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership of multi-household detached houses with the third floor (hereinafter “instant housing”) on some of the instant real estate owned by Seongbuk-gu Seoul, E, F, and the instant real estate. The Defendant independently occupied the instant land by using the attached appraisal map of the attached Forms 7, 4, 5, 6, and 7 in the order of priority among the instant land as part of the site of the instant housing (hereinafter “instant site”).

다. 원고는 2000년경 피고를 상대로 공유물분할의 소를 제기하였고, 2002. 2. 19. 이 법원 2000가단51870호로 ‘이 사건 부동산 중 별지 도면 표시 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 58, 7의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㉱, ㉲ 부분 합계 65.17㎡는 원고의 소유로, 위 도면 표시 7, 58, 15, 56, 57, 3, 43, 4, 5, 40, 6, 7의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㉮, ㉳부분 합계 104.83㎡는 피고의 소유로 각 분할한다’는 내용의 판결(다음부터 “이 사건 분할판결”이라 한다)이 선고되었으며, 2002. 11. 29.경 위 판결은 확정되었으나, 분할등기는 경료되지 아니하고 있다. 라.

The main issue site of this case is located within the part divided as owned by the defendant according to the judgment of subdivision of this case.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 10 evidence, Eul evidence 5, the result of on-site inspection by the court of first instance, the result of survey and appraisal by the court of first instance G, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff alleged a judgment on the claim for unjust enrichment equivalent to rent is jointly owned by the original and the Defendant. The Plaintiff’s land out of the instant land from April 8, 1997 to November 29, 2002, which became final and conclusive by the instant division judgment.