logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2018.08.16 2018고단112
응급의료에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Emergency Medical Service Act shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, emergency treatment or medical treatment of an emergency patient engaged in providing emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, threat or other means;

On February 7, 2018, at around 01:10, the Defendant arrived at the 119 first-aid and emergency room in the C Hospital in the Syang-si B, and the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance, such as: (a) having been in an emergency room and having his cellular phone taken the floor; and (b) having continued to treat the Defendant, the physician of the emergency room asked the Defendant’s arms, “Is the Defendant’s arms, where,” and “Is the Defendant’s arms, Is the Defendant’s will to sell.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with emergency treatment or treatment of emergency patients by the employees of emergency medical services due to violence.

2. On February 7, 2018, at around 03:20, the Defendant damaged public documents was arrested as a current criminal in violation of the Emergency Medical Service Act, such as Paragraph 1, and was brought to the investigation of the smuggling Police Station and the D office at the time of smuggling, and was brought into custody as well as the official documents used by the smuggling Police Station E. The Defendant prepared the “written direction for suspect entry”, which is the official documents used by the relevant public office E, and obtained approval from F, the background leading the head of the watchkeeping in the police station situation team, and then was to enter the Defendant in the detention room of the Seongbuk Police Station at the police station at the time of smuggling.

In doing so, “The foregoing “Written Direction of Suspect Admission” from the border E was flaged, and the documents were flaged into the flag’s own hand, and then was flaged into the flag’s own Australia.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the public documents used by the government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of G and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each investigation report (No. 5, 6) (Evidence List No. 5);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow