1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant Company was established on December 31, 2009 and employed 20 workers at the Simsan City and established and operated a local subsidiary in B around February 2012. The Plaintiff joined the Defendant Company and worked at B branch offices as C on January 17, 2012.

B. On May 24, 2012, the Plaintiff stated that Defendant Company D “ will only have a company.”

C. On June 7, 2012, Defendant Company reported the loss of the fourth insurance against Plaintiff (date of loss: June 1, 2012). D.

On June 22, 2012, the Plaintiff was demanded from the above D to leave the office of the Defendant Company B’s branch. On July 4, 2012, the Plaintiff received a notice of dismissal from the Defendant Company.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Around May 24, 2012, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion refers to the Plaintiff’s withdrawal from the company on the grounds that he/she was unable to respond to the question from D and failed to properly respond to the remittance, etc., and that he/she would retire from the company. However, the Plaintiff was again called from the said D, but did not receive any attention.

On May 25, 2012, the following day, the Plaintiff: (a) employees E and F of the Defendant Company, who were found to be a lodging place around 13:00 on May 25, 2012, referred to as “D’s bath and any overwork and stress he has accumulated during the period; (b) 25 days (Friday) and 26 days (Friday) as “I will attend work again from 28 days (Friday) and 28 days (Fridayday)”; and (c) on duty from May 28, 2012 to work at the local G, and (d) carried out the same duties as before pre-mail.

In light of these circumstances, the Plaintiff’s expression of intention of withdrawal on May 24, 2012 constitutes a false representation of intention, and even if it is a family medical doctor, the Plaintiff’s expression of intention of withdrawal was duly withdrawn with the consent of the Defendant Company.

Therefore, the defendant company unilaterally notified the plaintiff of his dismissal to the effect that D would go to the plaintiff on June 22, 2012.