Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving B taxi.

On November 16, 2013, at around 02:55, the Defendant driven the above taxi and driven the three-lane road in front of the 21st century Contracting State located in Magsan-dong, Magsan-dong, in the direction of 2001, along the two-lanes from the 2001 Magsan-dong.

At the same time, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed for persons engaged in driving service, to live well on the right and the right, and to drive safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and received the part of the body part of the victim C (the 55 years old) crossing the right side from the left side of the defendant's running direction by negligence, even though the vehicle driving signal was stopped, from the defendant's driving direction.

After all, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as T9 and T10’s closed frame, which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An actual condition survey report, field photograph, etc., report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident, investigation report, medical certificate, or caps and photographs;

1. Application of statutes to inquiries about criminal records, etc.;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution has the same history as that of the defendant, there is no sentence imposed on the defendant, in light of the method and result of the crime in this case, and there is a significant reason to the disadvantage of the defendant. However, there was no sentence imposed on the defendant, and the defendant has been agreed with the victim, and it was clear that the defendant has a deep variety of errors and has a social relation between the defendant and the victim, and other factors such as the motive and circumstance of the crime in this case, relationship between the defendant and the victim, the age, occupation, family relationship,