A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On September 11, 2012, the Defendant sent several letters containing the same contents as the table 3 through 6 attached Table 2 to October 22, 2012, on the ground that the victim E (here 23 years of age) requested the victim E (here 23 years of age) not to contact the Defendant, using the Handphone, to send the victim the text message “ how it has been able to governance in giving him/her a warning, but she has been able to do so.”

In other words, the victim was threatened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of this Act and subordinate statutes (Evidence No. 77 to 87 pages of evidence) by cutting down a text message and cutting down the Kakao Stockholm;

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the following sentencing, etc. in consideration of the following sentencing)

1. Where the degree of intimidation in the mitigated area (one month to eight months) (special mitigation person) is insignificant (one, four, and five types) for a crime of intimidation in Class 1 (Scope of Recommendation) (General Intimidation);

2. Where the degree of intimidation (one month to eight months) in the mitigation area (any person subject to special mitigation) is minor (one, four, and five types) for the second class crime (the scope of recommendation).

3. Where the degree of intimidation (one month to eight months) in the mitigation area (any person subject to special mitigation) is minor (one, four, and five types) for the crimes of intimidation No. 3 (Scope of Recommendation).

4. The scope of final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple offenses: January to February 20.

5. Although there was no agreement with the victim who was sentenced to a sentence, the degree of intimidation is minor, and there was no criminal conviction against the defendant, the defendant appears to have caused the above crime by dispute in the process of distinguishing the victim from the victim, and other punishments such as the order, taking into account the character, conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant.

Parts of innocence

1. The Defendant’s summary of the facts charged is as follows.