logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.10 2017고정148
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) inside each elevator of 114 1-2 Ra, 3-4 Ra, and 5-6 Ra, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Gi-si; and (b) reported the hidden truth.

As the title ",", the following content is recorded in the name of "to assist the representative of the former tenant D with the establishment of the E-Research Institute."

They have already known from September 2014 that this research institute had entered our apartment.

In January 2015, our residents knew of this fact, but D did not inform the residents of this fact at all.

This also visits and calls for viewing to the public to perform the construction of the research institute in recent years and receives signatures to agree with the residents.

D Based on the reason that it seems that the research institute that the residents opposed to the year 2013 was established, D has affixed A3 business posts containing the content " inside the elevator."

However, it was not true that the victim D visited the establishment of the victim D (state) E concrete mixed chemical research institute, and there was no signature from the residents to approve the establishment.

As such, the Defendant undermined the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written complaint (including a notice posted on the side);

1. CCTV photographs and field photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of the recycling of elevator motion pictures and CDs, 114 3-4 Ra;

1. Relevant Article 307 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The prosecutor’s summary of the assertion is that the date and time of the crime among the previous facts charged is “ around January 28, 2016,” and the written indictment is changed to “ around January 29, 2016,” and “ around January 21:20.”

arrow