1. The Plaintiff’s registration of transfer of ownership of each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 5, 7, and 8 among the lawsuits against Defendant B.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B completed the registration of transfer of ownership on September 5, 1990, under the receipt No. 9465 on September 22, 1990, with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, and 4 of the separate sheet owned by Defendant D.

B. Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on May 24, 200, receipt No. 5477 on May 24, 200, with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 3 and 6, which Defendant F owned.

C. Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer by reason of sale on January 5, 1977, No. 5477 received on May 24, 200, with respect to the real estate listed in paragraph 5 of the attached list, which was owned by Defendant E.

Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer by means of sale on December 22, 1982, as the receipt No. 3185 of March 23, 198, with respect to each real estate listed in the [Attachment List Nos. 7 and 8 owned by the Defendant Republic of Korea.

E. Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer due to inheritance by consultation and division on December 22, 1997, No. 17247, which was received on December 22, 1997, with respect to the real estate listed in Paragraph 9 of the Attached List No. 9, which was owned by his father G.

F. Defendant B completed the registration of initial ownership on the real estate listed in the attached list No. 10 of the attached list No. 17673, Dec. 27, 1997.

G. Defendant C filed a lawsuit seeking divorce, consolation money, division of property, etc. against Defendant B as the Youngcheon District Court’s Young-gu Branch 2013Dhap20000. On September 26, 2014, the said court rendered a ruling of recommending reconciliation that “Defendant B shall implement the procedures for registration of ownership transfer based on the division of property regarding each of the real property of this case to Defendant C” with respect to the division of property. Defendant C and B did not raise any objection thereto, and accordingly, the said decision of recommending reconciliation became final and conclusive, and accordingly, Defendant C is among the real property of this case.