logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.16 2016고단6995
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no person of the 2016 Highest 695 shall lend or lend any access medium with the receipt, demand or promise of compensation.

Nevertheless, at around 18:00 on June 27, 2016, the Defendant would offer two million won in return for using the check to pre-sale prior to the release of release on bail from his name in front of Suwon-si B lending, which is his own residence.

The phrase “, after hearing the word to the effect, sent the physical card and promised to receive the price, the Kwikset Service Articles, through the Kwikset Service Articles, sent by the person who was not the party’s husband, sent the physical card one and its password connected to the national bank account (D) in the name of the defendant C, the husband of the defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no person of "2016 Highest 8937" shall borrow or lend any access medium, or store, deliver or distribute such medium, with payment, demand, or promise.

Nevertheless, on June 3, 2016, the Defendant received a proposal from a person in the name of the deceased to the effect that “3 million won will be given in the month of a passbook in which the head of the Tong would transfer the passbook in connection with the sports soil lottery.” On the same day, the Defendant lent a medium of access to electronic financial transactions using Kwikset services in around 13:00 on the front side of the passbook connected respectively to the Kwikset Account (E), and then lent the password to the above passbook 2 and the above passbook 2 connected respectively by delivering it to the person in the name of the deceased.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement "2016 Highest 6995";

1. Statement of the police statement against G and C 1.

arrow