logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고합210
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 20, 2017, the Defendant sent 150,000 won in return for sexual intercourse to the child and juvenile C (the age of 13, the female) in the Geumdong-dong, Geumdong-si, Jeonju-si on August 20, 2017.

As a result, the defendant was committing the act of purchasing child or juvenile sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports (the telephone number of suspected juvenile C mobile phones stored in the target juvenile C mobile phones and the contents of conversation with male and female buyers);

1. Article 13 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and the Selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (The following circumstances favorable to the defendant among the grounds for sentencing);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. Where a conviction becomes final and conclusive on the facts constituting a sex offense subject to the registration of personal information to be registered under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and thus, is obligated to submit personal information to a competent agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

The reason for sentencing was that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected, the primary crime, and that the defendant was a child or juvenile from the beginning.

The fact that it is difficult to see is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance against the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant colored the other party of sexual traffic through the shacking method, and the fact that the payment of the price to the child or juvenile is made to the other party, and the quality of the crime is not negligible.

In addition, the age, sex, environment, and this case.

arrow