logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2012.11.30 2012고정3253
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a member of the Association C, an incorporated association, and even if he did not defame others by openly pointing out false information through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering people, he did not impair others’ reputation. On January 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) connected the Internet website C, which is called AdiF, on the website C, within one’s own residential area (E) Dong-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon; and (b) provided that “G members’ portion” in the item (E) at the free bulletin board is flick; and (c) provided in the main text, “The head of the G Welfare Association and the head of the Vice-Chairperson I, a member of the Association of many members, who had been employed from the beginning of the launch, by misappropriationing personal information of our employees from the beginning of the launch, forged a false power of attorney in a large amount; and (d) engaged in an unlawful exercise of power of attorney at a place where our members had been published.

It was confirmed that the Ngrgrance of the current G Welfare Association and the head of I had the employees of the Federation each day, and our members made a false representation of the confession jointly by appropriating the abstract attached to the use of the Federation as a member of the Federation and the civilian identification number and address, telephone number, etc., which is a valuable personal information on the card for persons with disabilities, and using the phone number, etc., which is a key personal information on the card for persons with disabilities, and the representative representative of the Dong-gu Incheon City returned to the 123456 dong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, which returned to the 123456 dong-gu, and the abstract of the confession was used illegally for two years.

The author posted a letter "asy as" (asy as).

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering people, the Defendant revealed publicly false information through the information and communication network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim H and I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the petition of complaint and evidence screen;

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of penalty;

arrow