A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On July 11, 2001, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in the Dong branch of the Seoul District Court, and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (on October 22, 2004 at night) at the Suwon District Court on October 22, 2004, and was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. at the Incheon District Court on May 31, 2007; on May 16, 2008, the Seoul East District Court issued a summary order of five hundred thousand won for a crime of assault at the Seoul East District Court on May 16, 2008; on November 26, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; on August 30, 2012, issued a summary order of five hundred thousand won by the same court.

1. Around 00:30 on August 9, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury by a deadly weapon, etc.) collected three free cupped games on the table, which were opened on the table table, and went to the head of the victim while opening a singing room in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the ground that the victim E (the victim E (the age of 56) who is a customer was slick.

As a result, the defendant puts two parts of the victim in need of treatment for about two weeks.

2. At around 00:50 on August 9, 2014, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties, G, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Gangseo-dong Police Station F District, who was called upon 112 report, attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender against the crime under paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) assaulted the said G at one time his face on one occasion.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's report processing and the lawful execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. A H statement;

1. On-site photographs, photographs, diagnostic notes, and criminal investigation reports are the suspect.