logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.04.21 2017고단253
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is clear that the “C” under the Bill for Amendments to Bill of Amendments made on April 3, 2017, Busan Dong-gu, Busan, is a clerical error in the “F,” and thus, the Defendant shall be corrected and recorded as above.

The parking management personnel of the D hotel parking lot (victim E, hereinafter referred to as the “instant parking lot”) in the area are those engaged in the business of collecting and keeping parking fees paid to customers in the area.

On July 21, 2016, while serving in the parking management office of the instant parking lot, the Defendant: (a) around 01:06, 10,000 parking fees received from customers (name in secret); (b) around 03:22 on the same day; and (c) around 03:29 on the same day, 10,000 parking fees received from customers (name in secret); and (b) around 03:29 on the same day, 10,000 parking fees received from the customers (name in secret); and (c) around that time, she brought the Defendant’s money in custody for the victim and used it at his/her own discretion due to

Accordingly, the defendant embezzleds the property of the victim who has been kept in business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol with respect to E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of report on internal investigation and investigation;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Considering the matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that the amount of damage caused by the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was not significant, that all the amount of damage was deposited (No. 215 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Busan District Court Branch Branch of the District Court in 2017), that there was no record of criminal punishment other than the previous offense of a drinking fine in 20

arrow