All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) Defendant 1 did not receive the victim D with a vehicle. Defendant 2 did not constitute the injury of the crime of injury on the ground that there is no need for medical treatment due to the misapprehension of the legal doctrine as the wife caused by the victim is minor.

3) The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 2 million won) is too unreasonable and unfair. B. The prosecutor’s Defendant inflicted injury upon the victim D by being a vehicle. The lower court acquitted the Defendant of the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles on the ground that the vehicle does not constitute a dangerous article under Article 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act even though it does not constitute a dangerous article.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below of first instance and the court of first instance as to the argument of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles of the defendant: ① The victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to the court of court below that he suffered bodily injury due to the front kne part of the vehicle driven by the defendant, the left kne part of the vehicle with the front kne part of the vehicle driven by the defendant, and the right kne part of the kne part; ② the defendant also stated that the victim left the vehicle while driving the vehicle in front of the victim; ② the victim made a statement that the victim had opened the front kne part of the vehicle; ③ the victim was recognized as adjacent to the defendant's vehicle; ③ there was a entrance at the right side of the place where the vehicle was parked; ③ there was a entrance at the construction site at the time of the occurrence of the vehicle; on the left side of the vehicle, the victim appears to have been sufficient to leave the vehicle bypassing the victim to the right side; ④ At the same court of the J.