logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.10 2016고합1029
공직선거법위반
Text

1. Defendant A’s fine of KRW 7,000,000, Defendant B’s fine of KRW 5,000,000, Defendant C’s fine of KRW 800,00.

Reasons

. Around 10:59 on March 11, 199, the Defendant’s cell phone from the Defendant’s cell phone to the Defendant’s cell phone, and the Defendant’s cell phone called to “I candidate” and conducted a competition campaign in a way other than that prescribed by the Public Official Election Act.

On March 9, 2016, the Defendant, including this, conducted a competition campaign in a way other than that prescribed by the Public Official Election Act on 19 occasions from March 15:41 to March 14:16, 2016, as indicated in the List of Crimes (1).

3. Defendant B, around March 9, 2016, conducted a prior public opinion poll by telephone in Seoul AE with respect to competition lines, and Defendant B, as the mobile phone of the Defendant, conducted a prior public opinion poll by telephone.

Any number may also be faced and ‘I', ‘I', the number named ‘I', is divided into facs, and facsia.

It is rare to request the maximum thickness of nearby friendly parts.

Method of changing a house phone from a Hand phone to a Hand phone: * (Attached Table 88) Handphone number* (Attached Table *) Habphone number *

Lastly, the text message Ma88*(Attached Table) was sent simultaneously to 22 persons, including AF, to conduct a competition campaign in a way other than that prescribed by the Public Official Election Act.

The Defendant, including that, on March 9, 2016, from around 14:26 to March 20:4, 2016, sent text messages to 2,219 persons through 26 times, and conducted a competition campaign by means other than those prescribed by the Public Official Election Act.

4. Defendant C, at around 17:50 on March 9, 2016, at the I candidate’s election campaign office located in Seoul R, conducted a prior public opinion poll by telephone in relation to a competition line by the H political party, and Defendant C calls the Defendant’s mobile phone to AG for “I because a public opinion poll is likely to take place.”

“The competition campaign was conducted in a way other than that prescribed by the Public Official Election Act.”

The Defendant, including this, from March 9, 2016 to March 21, 2016, attached Form 17:50 to March 21, 2016.

arrow