The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the 24t cargo vehicles, B, and C.

On August 19, 2014, at around 15:55, the Defendant, at 38 km-ro 122-ro, the 122-lane in the name of the head of Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant continued two-lanes of the 500-lane radius from the tent-ro to the erode of the two-lanes depending on the speed of 87 km.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent and negligent in driving the vehicle while driving the vehicle on the front side of the victim C (the 49-year-old truck) driving D MT truck and the rear part of the 24t truck, which is the front part of the 24t truck.

As a result, the Defendant suffered serious injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as less than six-month medical treatment, injury to aquatic cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebr

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 3(2) of the same Act. The records show that the victim expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the defendant on February 6, 2015, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.