beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiffs are parents of D (hereinafter “the deceased”) who died on January 31, 2016, and the Defendant is a school juristic person operating the E hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”).
B. (1) On August 14, 2013, Plaintiff B was diagnosed by F Hospital that the fetus growth restriction, the transfer of a child, and the fetus heart loss were conducted, and around 14:40 on August 16, 2013, the 37th day of pregnancy, which was the 5th day of August 16, 2013, the Defendant Hospital’s medical staff was transferred to the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital. (2) around 17:30 on August 16, 2013, the Defendant Hospital conducted a sect test against Plaintiff B. At that time, the sect was measured at 2,101g of the body, and the transfer index was measured at 3.9cm.
In addition, as a result of the diagnosis of the plaintiff B, the medical professionals in the defendant hospital shown 2 cm, 50% of the opening, 50% of the fire, and the e-mail of the deceased through the e-gambling boom from 19:54 on the same day to observe the e-gambling of the deceased.
3) Around 08:00 on August 17, 2013, Plaintiff B maintained the state in which the delivery of a part of the body was not commenced with 2 cm and 50% of the body. At around 23:30 on the same day, the Defendant hospital’s medical personnel provided Plaintiff B with 3 L/L of an oxygen to the Plaintiff’s mouth. Around 01:15 on August 18, 2013, the fetus heart was 130-160 parts while maintaining 130:0 on August 18, 2013, Plaintiff B’s fetus heart was administered to Defendant B at around 10:10 on a temporary date and up to 10:30 on August 18, 2013, Plaintiff B’s fetus was recovered from the body of the Plaintiff’s hospital up to 3:00 minutes on a temporary recovery of the body up to 3:00 minutes on May 20, 2013.
5 On August 19, 2013, at around 13:00, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted the Plaintiff’s fetus heart test with respect to the Plaintiff B. Since there is no apparent structural error, the Plaintiff explained it to the Plaintiff B. After the Plaintiff’s request, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital attempted only the natural portion at the Plaintiff’s request, but agreed to implement the king surgery in an emergency situation.
(c).